It seems
like ever since George Clooney decided to get engaged, a royal schism has
fallen upon the blogospheres – with half of bloggers praising the oh so
wonderfully tactful (not to mention gorgeous)‘Amal’ on how she managed to 'convince' the notorious bachelor to marry her. While the other half (who had
noted him as a commitment-phobe previously) wrote skeptically about the
authenticity of this ‘engagement’.
Yaaaaaaaaaawn
Seriously,
as much as I would like to say who cares, the internet (10 steps to find a
man, 12 signs he’s marriage material, 15 ways to get him on one knee) and
major advertisers who sponsor the websites with these articles would beg to
differ.
So let me
tell you a little story. Once upon a time, there was Disney. Then, there was
the economy. Disney said that prince charming would come along, and he would
have a palace (house), a horse and carriage (some kind of vehicle) and lots of
gold (Money). All you had to do to get the prince, was wear a dress (be pretty)
and have some kind of sob story (be a 'good' girl), and he would find you.
Then men
went to war, women started working, women liked working, the ‘shame’ on men who
couldn’t provide for ‘their’ wives was lifted, and just like that, chivalry was
dead.
Lol. Ok it
wasn’t that extreme but you know what I mean.
Then the
economy said ‘Hail THE MIGHTY recession!’
And pretty
good girls found that their wait was starting to take too long… so instead of realizing that the reason that the prince wasn't coming was because he could no longer afford to be the only working spouse and therefore getting a job, they tried to chase the men
themselves and thus swapped their title of being the ‘shy rose cheeked maiden’ for
the ‘clingy, needy and dependant woman.’
Basically,
its Disney’s fault.
The reason
George Clooney refused to commit before Amal isn’t something I can tell you
because I have never asked him. But what I can say is this, there is nothing
more liberating than being single – you do what you want, when you want, how
you want, you can pick up and leave, start over, integrate with new people
without ever watching what you do/say, and afford to blow money without batting
an eyelid or ever feeling guilt/being nagged. Even in your single state you
will still have some things you will have to consider like family, friends,
your place of work etc – but even with all of those considerations, it remains
the state in which you are most free.
So if you
are accomplished, free and happy – why on earth would you want to tie yourself
down to someone who is just going to depend on you?
Chances are,
unless the person shares your interests, work ethics, understands that
sometimes you are busy, and is overall adding to your life – you are not going
to give up your single life for them. Period.
I like to
think of it as a swap – I would swap my single life for a relationship if that
relationship is worth the swap, so for everything I lose, I will gain something
and overall the relationship is better than being single.
Amal is a
very accomplished human rights lawyer, she speaks 3 languages fluently and is
from a different race to George…George is a well accomplished A-lister who made it
big in Hollywood – being an A-lister means he got the top ranking for his
industry – they are both highly and equally successful people and therefore have a
lot to talk about/in common - if there is one thing we can be sure of, it’s
that neither of them need one another, they just did the equation and found it
worked out with a profit.
No comments:
Post a Comment