Wednesday, 1 June 2016
Cheating Death at a "Death Cafe"
I'm going to a Death Cafe and I'm actually quite scared.
There, I said it!
I have no idea why, but I find my feelings fascinating. We will never escape death, yet across the cultures that I've experienced in my lifetime the topic has never been brought up without a hint of fear. No one outside of a religious context has ever come back from death to tell us what happens. And of course religion requires 'faith' and 'belief' as its non-falsiable.
I'm not sure what to expect, but I'm guessing we will discuss what we think happens when we die and although no one can be sure of their theories, what I do know is that there are multiple things we do, to reassure ourselves of the inevitable.
The first example I heard growing up was that when we die, we are judged. Depending on how good/bad we were (in accordance with the specific religious content we followed) we either go to heaven, which is basically like earth but we just never die (the apparent ideal human experience) or we go to hell where we burn. Another option is that all of our memories are deleted and we are re-incarnated as a better human being (subjective to what 'better means' could be richer, more influential, more humble etc) or we become an animal, as punishment for our bad deeds.
It's ironic that in one theory the ideal is to be on earth and never die, and the other theory, that is the punishment.
To say the least, we are very confused about what happens after we die, and for that reason, there are things that we do to 'cheat death' during our lifetime.
Have you ever thought about why most people desire children in the future before they're even adults? Why is it a natural desire to want to bring a life into the world? Some people believe that children are an implicit subconscious connection to the world, that through our children we remain immortal - through them, a part of us that remains in the world after we die. It is for the same reason that we donate organs and wish to have memorials instead of funerals...
It is for the same reason that we obsess over maintaining healthy lifestyles and crave approval from other humans, as a way of maintaining a long and happy life... But why do we fear the unknown so much?
Did we fear life before we were born? Why do some people wish to take their own lives? And more importantly, why is it that after so many years and so many cycles of life, we still don't know a single thing about death?
I'll keep you posted after the event.
Thursday, 26 May 2016
When your 'home' Culture clashes with your Western Identity
I know, I say this a lot.
And I really can't say its the last time lol.
But!!!
I was so busy working on establishing a youtube channel that blogger kind of slipped my mind a little...
So Youtube is going quite well... although I do have a story to tell you about when it didn't go so well...
As a British Sudanese there is so much that I get wrong in Sudanese culture and I have a lot to learn, but being fluent in Arabic and of a Sudanese ethnicity makes my mistakes far less forgivable to Sudanese people.
Following strong requests from my youtube comments to produce videos in Arabic I decided to try it out... and two videos received a very negative response from the non-english speaking community. One addressed harassment and the other was a story about a vet I met briefly who told me she refused to treat a dog because well... it was a dog.
As you can imagine, a vet refusing to treat an animal puzzled me... I didn't really understand why someone would choose this particular career if they had a prejudice towards animals... It turned out that in Sudan, people use animals for their livelihood and not for any sort of emotional attachment - having a dog was a sign of wealth and the vet saw bringing a dog as a 'show off' gesture. She was accustomed to treating cows and sheep which people use for their livelihoods.
Harassment was also an issue that proved to be very sensitive in the Sudanese community, although many of the comments resorted to insults (very common in any youtube community) there was an underlying belief that addressing the issue was somehow worse than the issue itself. I was called 'galeelat adab' which translates to 'badly mannered' and I decided to investigate the issue further.
After carefully analysing the comments I realised that the issue wasn't so much me, or how I was addressing the issue, it was more the issue itself. In a country where people are starving, earning very little, pressured from every aspect to partake in corruption - harassment is something little see as a real issue. It is a 'rich people problem'. The public was outraged that an issue like this is even being addressed meanwhile other issues like the government and the state of the country were left unspoken about.
As it isn't really possible to speak about the social and economic climate in the country due to the lack of freedom of expression, I decided to stick to English videos for the time being... but these issues highlighted the struggle of growing up between cultures - my western friends wouldn't be able to fathom a vet who refuses to treat a dog, whereas my eastern ones wouldn't fathom a patient bringing in a dog in the first place...
And I really can't say its the last time lol.
But!!!
I was so busy working on establishing a youtube channel that blogger kind of slipped my mind a little...
So Youtube is going quite well... although I do have a story to tell you about when it didn't go so well...
As a British Sudanese there is so much that I get wrong in Sudanese culture and I have a lot to learn, but being fluent in Arabic and of a Sudanese ethnicity makes my mistakes far less forgivable to Sudanese people.
Following strong requests from my youtube comments to produce videos in Arabic I decided to try it out... and two videos received a very negative response from the non-english speaking community. One addressed harassment and the other was a story about a vet I met briefly who told me she refused to treat a dog because well... it was a dog.
As you can imagine, a vet refusing to treat an animal puzzled me... I didn't really understand why someone would choose this particular career if they had a prejudice towards animals... It turned out that in Sudan, people use animals for their livelihood and not for any sort of emotional attachment - having a dog was a sign of wealth and the vet saw bringing a dog as a 'show off' gesture. She was accustomed to treating cows and sheep which people use for their livelihoods.
Harassment was also an issue that proved to be very sensitive in the Sudanese community, although many of the comments resorted to insults (very common in any youtube community) there was an underlying belief that addressing the issue was somehow worse than the issue itself. I was called 'galeelat adab' which translates to 'badly mannered' and I decided to investigate the issue further.
After carefully analysing the comments I realised that the issue wasn't so much me, or how I was addressing the issue, it was more the issue itself. In a country where people are starving, earning very little, pressured from every aspect to partake in corruption - harassment is something little see as a real issue. It is a 'rich people problem'. The public was outraged that an issue like this is even being addressed meanwhile other issues like the government and the state of the country were left unspoken about.
As it isn't really possible to speak about the social and economic climate in the country due to the lack of freedom of expression, I decided to stick to English videos for the time being... but these issues highlighted the struggle of growing up between cultures - my western friends wouldn't be able to fathom a vet who refuses to treat a dog, whereas my eastern ones wouldn't fathom a patient bringing in a dog in the first place...
Friday, 11 September 2015
Why do Whites Hate Talking about White Privilege?
Imagine a conversation that always ends with you being the
bad guy.
Always.
When I moved to Sudan, it was the first time I'd ever
experienced racial privilege. I am in the ‘right’ race, I am of the ‘right’
complexion I am from the ‘right’ tribe and I have access to everything.
In a nutshell, this is essentially the same thing as ‘White Privilege’,
which is identified exclusively to whites because they receive it everywhere in
the world, not just in ‘their’ countries.
In reality, privilege is not about the colour of your skin –
it’s more related to your people’s ability to market themselves in the best way
possible - to as many parts of the world.
The British conquered the world we live in, they won wars against
supposed ‘equals’ and then colonized the rest of the known world. They spread
their people to lands as far as Australia, New Zealand, America and Canada and
built some of the greatest civilizations in recorded history.
History, which they recorded.
Interestingly, colonizing makes the offspring of colonies
think highly of you, even though essentially it is just a fancy word for being
a bossy, powerful hegemonic immigrant. A person who moves from their land,
occupies another with the agenda of taking over and inserting their way of governing
(ironically this is what Britain and America fear ‘Muslims’ will do in the
west, but they call them terrorists)
And if anyone other than them had written history that is
exactly how they would have been remembered – terrorists. To make things a
little clearer, I am pro British secular values and anti the current fundamental
Sharia Law interpretations, but that doesn't give me the right to force my
beliefs on to others because I think my beliefs are ‘superior’.
The colonization allowed these people to have access to
unlimited world resources, knowledge, money and power and due to this, whites
are able to project any image they like about themselves on a global scale. The
entire world sees when whites do good deeds, when the world sees the white
house, they don’t see barbaric white history whereby they forced slaves to build
it – they see some of the finest white leaders in the world making some of the
most powerful and influential decisions – because this is the narrative whites
project, and everyone absorbs it.
What people don’t realize is that every race does this,
every race talks about the good things in their countries and when a murderer
or a thug is broadcast on the news, everyone knows its an exception – the
majority of the race isn’t like this and there is always a bad apple. The
difference between other races and the white race however – the rest of the
world only watches their media, and white media – nothing else.
Arabs watch Arabic news, and White (Western) News
Asians watch Asian news, and White (Western) News
Africans watch African news, and White (Western) News
And Whites, watch White (Western) News
So when whites talk about a ‘black thug’ – all non blacks
now see blacks as thugs. When whites talk about ‘extremist Muslims terrorists’
all non Muslims see muslims as terrorists and when whites talk about fanatic
church killers – not all whites are seen as racial extremists because they will
need to explain to the white public why this happened, so they dig deeper into
the story (lone wolf, crazy, psychopath etc.)
The world understands other ethnicities from bias white institutions
– institutions that were set by racists who made it impossible for non-whites
to ever speak up or be seen as humans with rights. However when things changed and tolerance
became a sign of progression and not weakness – the structures of the media
didn't. Non-racists whites and other ethnicities decided that pretending race
doesn't exist was the best way to deal with race issues – but pretending not to
see the race without amending the structures of the racist institutions doesn’t
work, it in fact marginalizes more – just in a new justifiable way. It’s the
reason you are so much more likely to get stopped if you’re black driving a
fancy car than if you are of any other racial background (the structure of
society teaches you implicitly that this achievement is not expected of blacks
unless they are thieves or rappers)
The same thing goes in Sudan, I don’t have to worry about
not being accepted for jobs because my name indicates my racial/religious
origin, I don’t have to worry about renting houses/cars because people assume I
will always pay (because of my racial privilege). I don’t have to worry about
my children in school being marginalized not just by students but by teachers
because they are from the ‘right’ race. I don’t have to concern myself about my
‘race’ being the reason for injustice happening to me – it's a hassle I don't
have to deal with.
But what I do have to deal with, are those who hate me
because of it. Marginalized minorities who have to work twice as hard to get
half of what I have. They will never understand that I see this as unfair too –
they will never believe that I see them as equal to me and they will never
truly believe that I deserve all that I have… unless I stop enjoying the
privileges my racist ancestors provided when they built the blueprint for the
way we live today.
The problem with addressing white privilege is that the
motive is unclear – do you want whites to suffer like everyone else? Or do you
want the privilege too?
We need to take responsibility for the global lengths that ‘white’ western news travels – and for this
reason, western media needs to represent all aspects of everyone living in the
west, and not just the whites in the west.
Outside of Britain people find it difficult to accept that
you can be anything other than white and British – this needs to change.
Everyone deserves to be treated without suspicion, not just whites. And in order to do this, minorities need to
stop assuming that whites who enjoy privilege and hate talking about it are
doing so because they think they deserve it and you don’t – and whites need to
stop assuming that anyone who talks about white privilege thinks they are racist
– we know you are not, but your ancestors were, and they built the blueprint
for the world we live in today!
Saturday, 5 September 2015
The 'Migrant Crisis' - Why is it a Crisis?
The Refugee crisis in Syria and Afghanistan is now
mainstream.
In other words, the refugees are trying to reach countries with a
powerful media presence.
Countries in the West.
Refugees have been fleeing Syria for a long time now, with
many now residing here in Sudan, nearly fully integrated – married to Sudanese
and settled. Of course the right wing Sudanese
newspapers made a little frenzy about this, the same way they did/do with the
South Sudanese, (even when we were one country) – right wing will always be
right wing, and racists always target the weak to maintain their positions of
power.
There is not much of a welfare system here, but the Syrians
who moved here got something they didn’t get in Syria – safety. Most of the
Syrian refugees I’ve come across that came to Sudan now own businesses running
accessory shops or restaurants… They
were clearly doing well in Syria, before the war.
The war that claimed 250,000
lives and left half of the pre-war population displaced and fleeing.
It was absolutely not the choice of the Syrian people to be
in this situation, the same way that it was not the choice of Iraqi’s or
Afghans – or if we scratch a little further in history the displaced millions
after World War II. This is why they are refugees and not migrants.
Many people ask – why don't they go to Lebanon or Turkey or
countries closer to them? (The underlying assumption being that they want
Europe because they are lazy ‘cockroaches’ who want to benefit from welfare
they don’t deserve)
The short answer is they did, many of them are there –
however outside of your own country you are always treated as a second class
citizen, and Europe is much more subtle in its discrimination than the Middle
East and North Africa and much more compassionate towards those in need.
Compassion it can afford – take this example, when the bank crisis happened in
the UK, The government gave the banks an amount that would total the GDP of Spain.
That was just to bail out the banks. Although you may think that Middle Eastern
countries such as Saudi-Arabia, Kuwait and the UAE are wealthy (rich with oil),
the GDP of Spain is no where near the amount that these countries make – it
exceeds them massively.
Europe is extremely wealthy, to the point where when you
take the total income of the world – you can see that Europe and North America are
the only two continents where the total world population is exceeded
(disproportionally) by the wealth. Take a look at this graph.
This was in the year 2000, this year the UN published a report
stating that the richest 1% of the world owns 40% of the world’s wealth.
In terms of wealth, we can absolutely afford to take in and
help out these refugees and in terms of helping out – it is very unlikely that Europeans
don’t want to help out.
I think the driving force behind most of the media’s
frenzies is clear - the fear of lack of integration.
The fear of investing in a
foreign force that will later turn against you. We have seen in many European countries media stories about communities of people who simply refuse to integrate - but why is this? And is this as big a problem as we think it is?
TBC.
Saturday, 29 August 2015
Why did you Rape her? A Former Rapist Explains his Motives
During my final year of studying at university I conducted
research on women’s health and beauty norms.
The research overlapped with eating disorders and along with most
people, I thought these were mental health problems caused by the desire to
look ‘thin’. I was informed that nearly exclusively, all the women who suffered
from eating disorders (including the late princess Diana who suffered from
bulimia) shared one desire.
The desire for control over their lives. I was just as
shocked later on in my life when I discovered rape was a crime of power and not
lust.
An
article published on the Telegraph (UK) by the writer Nisha Lilia Diu gripped
me. She spoke about rape, from the perspective of a remorseful former rapist. I highly recommend you read this article - I
will link it below.
Is
there really such thing as a remorseful rapist? As societies we often struggle
with this topic, blaming the woman has been a very long tradition in most countries
in the world and as much as we know rape is the fault of the rapist and only
the rapist we struggle even in the most progressive societies to come up with a
solution.
In the
west we are so adamant to steer away from previous beliefs about it being the
fault of the victim that we steer in the opposite direction and completely fail
to humanize a rapist, out of fear of returning to ‘backward’ thinking. Although
returning to old thinking about the victim being to blame would be an immense
move in the wrong direction, not thinking about or throwing rapists in prison
and releasing them after 18 months usually does nothing to the rapist except
prevent them from offending for 18 months – They go back to it upon release, in
most cases.
The
article revealed some interesting findings; just by speaking to a former rapist
we can begin to understand that rape, unlike many other crimes is committed
across occupations and socio-economic class. It is a crime of power and not
‘about what she was wearing’ but more, how vulnerable she was. By neglecting the real reason rape occurs we have marginalized other groups who are susceptible to being raped such as young boys, the disabled and the vulnerable. Rapists often
come from a history of sexual assault during childhood but perhaps the most
shocking thing to me was that it has been linked to witnessing violence towards
women… domestic violence.
The
ex rapist whom the article refers to with the pseudonym ‘John’ revealed some
very deep and thought provoking information. In his case, stress was a majorly
contributing factor to when he was likely to rape, he felt no guilt at the time
and believes the cycle began early, when he was just 15 years old. He
experienced sexual abuse as a child and perhaps from this we can deduct where
the need for power comes from – the rejection of being a victim.
During
his prison sentence John received therapy in the form of ‘Sex offender treatment programs’ (SOTP), which surprisingly helped him realize the impact of his
crimes.
It wasn’t
his stay in prison that helped him, it was the therapy.
Although
John struggles to trust himself, he understands that the world sees him as a
monster – a very strong motive to want to return to prison. After reading the full article I began to
understand rape in a different way. The victim is left broken, abused and
mortified. The rapist doesn’t usually care enough to remember her. They are
thinking in a completely different way – there is nothing you can wear or do to
stop a rapist from raping you if they are ever given the chance to.
But as a
society, we have been so fixated on advising women on how to ‘not get raped’
instead of dealing in a sufficient manor with those doing the raping. This is a
cycle, sexual abuse coupled with neglect and early childhood trauma – no one is
born a rapist.
Before
anyone develops a sense of nostalgia towards rapists I would like to remind them
that during the time of the rape, rapists are nothing less than mindless
monsters – the childhood traumas are not an excuse, they are a suggested reason,
and reason will help us figure out how to deal with it, and hopefully prevent
it all together. Throwing rapists in prison doesn’t stop them from re-offending
when they get out, and sadly, only those whose sentences are over three years
will have access to (SOTP).
In order
to stop rape from happening, we need to first learn the motive – only then can
we start prevention.
Friday, 21 August 2015
Dear Young Woman, Before Society Starts to Talk to You, Read This.
Hi Blogger
I recently made a video calling out some of the ridiculous
‘beauty’ norms that we have in the west, east and everywhere inbetween
frankly. As we previously discussed, beauty is directly related to the country
perceived by the world as the most advanced (this perception of beauty is of course not
natural, and requires years of colonialism and forceful persuasion by the
‘dominant’ race on its colonies.)
This is why typically
beautiful features are usually European or attainable by Europeans only.
See this photo from an Indian children’s book teaching
children English. As you can see this brainwashing starts very young.
If you have the time, you can watch the vlog below, I would enjoy your input.
Inspired by this theme of talking to my younger self, I
decided to dedicate today’s blog to women. I’d like to give advice to young
women around the world about life which I have picked up along the way.
1.
You will be judged by the way you look more than
anything else you do. Don’t bother thinking about this – do not listen to
advice about dressing how you want to be perceived… this advice will lead you
down a dodgy path which you will inevitably regret. Be you, if you don't know
who you are yet, try out whatever you want until you find it, and own it.
2.
You are born with a need and desire to help
people you love, and give as much of yourself as possible – the media exploits
this need massively by feeding you fruitless advice, and then telling you what
to do when their advice doesn't work. It’s not that they mean to ruin your
life, its simply that the people writing the articles are often inexperienced and going on stereotypes and the need to pay bills, so they write with the hope to
sell, not to help you. Don’t ask online why ‘he won’t text back’ - ask him. And if you’re scared of how that
will make him feel about you – think about how much he cares about how him not
texting YOU back makes you feel.
3.
When a woman is raped, in every country in the
world there will be people who ask, what was she wearing? What was the time?
And who was she with? – This is because we live in a man’s world. Men are never
blamed without an explanation being offered. Ignore this. Remember this - Rape
is the fault of the woman when she is raping. Rape is the fault of the man when
he is raping.
4.
In relationships, again because we live in a
man’s world (a world where men are the center from which we judge the norms)
women are depicted as ‘emotional’ which is a positive thing, but the world says
this is negative. Ignore them, and be as emotional as you want.
5.
Due to feminism and gender equality, countries
like Sweden and Norway are very sexually liberal and have the same expectations
and rewards for both women and men. This is wonderful, but it also demonstrates
how we live in a man dominated society. Gender equality is perceived as ‘Woman
can do all the things men can do, too” in reality, women don't want to be men. We enjoy other things too, but
society thinks men are really great, and the best reward a woman can receive is
to be allowed to be like a man. Ignore this, and be whatever you feel like. The point in gender equality is providing choice.
6.
When people tell you ‘you’re the man in your
relationship’ they mean you are the strong great ‘non emotional’ one. When they
say to a man ‘you’re the woman’ they mean you’re the pathetic emotional one.
Being emotional makes a man pathetic, being emotional makes a woman normal … do
you see where this is going? (it’s acceptable for women to be ‘pathetic and
weak’ but not for men, the same way its acceptable for children to scream and
cry but not for adults, why? Because adults know better, and so do men) This is
patronizing, I know, its difficult to get to grips with – but that's how the
world is, so try not to feed it by being ‘less emotional’ emotions are a
wonderful thing, they are not pathetic – they are the reason YOU are the one who
carries life into this world for nine months and YOU are the one who
breastfeeds and YOU are the one who loves unconditionally.
7.
When
dating, be frank, upfront and honest. Talk to the man from day one about what
you want. The world demands that you tip-toe around men and wait until they are
comfortable and not bring up things that you want like marriage/security/monogamy
etc. Bring up what you want, be frank and it will save you a lot of time, and
relieve you of many men who do not want the same things but may be otherwise
compatible with you.
8.
You are a giver, men are takers. This is fed by
society massively. It’s not only men who reinforce the ‘man’s’ world. Its
mostly women. Women who defend the double standards in men’s rights ‘as long as
men take care and marry obedient women like ‘them’. Whatever you do, DO
NOT become one of these women.
9.
Although western countries claim they have
gender equality, women like J.K Rowling and Oprah Winfrey speak often about how
sexism is far bigger than racism or any other prejudice when you climb up the
ladder. Climb anyway – it wont last long if many women make it.
10. Although in Eastern countries they claim that
traditional gender roles are tied to religious obedience, they are not. They
are tied to cultural norms and political advantages. You will find that you can
challenge them using their own scriptures. You don't have to abandon your
beliefs to achieve equality, God doesn't see you as inferior, politics and
culture wants you to be, so stand up for your rights.
11. In western countries there is a phenomenon
known as ‘Resting Bitchy Face’ this is where a woman is expected to be smiling
all the time so that she is not called a bitch. Frown and cry whenever you want
to, and let everyone get used to it.
12. In the east women who smile are seen as
promiscuous, and sexually inviting. Be careful who you smile at, but remember,
you have the right to smile or frown as a reflection of how you feel – don't
put yourself in a position of danger, but campaign to change things that
infringe your rights.
13. In
the west if a man cheats on you, you are expected to walk out, and start over –
you should respect yourself and leave him. People will judge you if you stay.
Don’t concern yourself with this. If you feel that this is what you want to do,
do it. If not, stay with him and work things out. Stay because YOU want to, not
for the kids or because you’re used to him. The world says you wont find
anyone, - women who have left beg to differ.
14. In
the east if a man cheats on you, you are expected to stay with him, he only
cheated because you are ‘not enough’ ‘not giving enough’ ‘being too nice’
‘being too distant’ or … because he’s a man and it’s the other woman’s fault.
You should think about your children and him and your family and society –
never ever think about you. If you want to leave him, LEAVE. People will try to
make you feel bad – ignore them, they are more concerned about maintaining
sexist norms that will keep this cycle of hypocrisy alive than your children and your happiness.
15. If
you want to be respected in the west, you have to be a working woman. If you
want emotional satisfaction (in most women, not all) you will want a family and
children. Gender equality means women can do what men do – not men do what
‘women’ have and still do, so don't delude yourself, you are expected to take
care of domestics as well as work. Don’t buy into this. The real meaning of
gender equality is that we are both equally valued. Find a man who respects and
SHARES, not just ‘helps out’ with domestics.
16. If
you feel like feminism is wrong, and we should be promoting ‘gender equality’
instead – my darling you have been sadly deluded into believing that the world
sees men and women as equal. Remember, men have always had rights, and it was
during a time where sexism was the norm when men created the blueprint for the
world we live in today. Therefore cultural, political and societal norms back
up sexism against women – making it harder for us to have rights, let alone
stand up for them. Although sexism against men does exist, it is not as
institutionally accepted as sexism against women. Don’t forget this.
17. And
finally. Sexual liberation means
men and women can enjoy relations without commitment or fear of judgment in
many countries. This is something men have been enjoying for a very long time,
and only recently women are ‘enjoying’ this too. If you don’t enjoy this – don't do it. There
is nothing wrong with you, this was, for a very long time how men enjoyed
themselves. Women traditionally like to be loved emotionally more and enjoyed
physical relations when they were emotionally attached. Imagine a world where men
were allowed to be emotional without being judged or looked down upon – you
could probably be emotionally loving to many men without getting attached, but
they would be hurt eventually by this as this is not how they traditionally
enjoy themselves. The same principle
applies in reverse. One of the worst things society does to you as a woman is
that it makes you dislike things about you, things that if you changed would
make men happier, don’t change anything you don't want to change, and embrace who you are - you are great.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)